Electronic Signatures Electronic signatures on PDF attachments within your application are not allowed. Documents with signatures e. Filenames Save all document attachments with descriptive filenames of 50 characters or less including spaces. Use unique filenames for all attachments in an application or within a component of a multi-project application.
Tips for a Strong Resubmission Application Considerations for Resubmissions You probably want to jump right into your resubmission, but first check your original funding opportunity announcement FOA to confirm it hasn't expired, you still meet eligibility requirements, and NIAID or your chosen institute still participates.
If the announcement has been reissued or updated, make sure you're aware of new deadlines, eligibility criteria, Nih cover letter resubmission, and instructions, all of which may have changed since your previous application. But you'll still want to check your new FOA for the information we just mentioned.
Should You Wait for the Summary Statement? You may want to begin revising even before you get your summary statement since waiting may cause you to miss the next receipt date.
While you must address all the reviewers' comments from your summary statement, you can start adding new data or making other improvements to the application.
Just keep in mind that you'll still have to wait for your summary statement before you resubmit, and you may have to revise your application further based on what reviewers note. Don't Hurry NIH has special rules to help new R01 investigators resubmit for the next receipt date by posting their summary statements sooner and letting them resubmit later than established investigators.
If you qualify for this benefit, don't take it unless you're certain you've addressed reviewer comments in your summary statement. Rushing to submit a subpar application won't help you get funded. Waiting to strengthen your application will give you the best chance of succeeding in the long run.
Choose Your Path Your resubmission can take one of two paths: Keep in mind you might not have a study section choice for some funding opportunity announcements, e. Revising and Requesting the Same Study Section. If your reviewers were enthusiastic about your idea and found fixable problems, revising and requesting the same study section is usually the way to go.
This route is the most common one and works well when the points of contention are limited. Reviewers look at the application in the context of their critiques, so the approach is effective if you can readily answer their concerns.
Be aware that your application may still face some new reviewers who may raise different issues. Revising and Requesting a Different Study Section.
If your reviewers were not enthusiastic about your idea, reassess the study section. Do you have a sense that no matter what you wrote your reviewers wouldn't have appreciated it? That's a clue that your application and the study section were a poor fit.
But be careful not to assume that the reviewers were the problem—first thoroughly size up the application's faults that they identified. To gauge whether the study section may have been unsuitable, use the roster attached to your summary statement to view the committee members' names, and check out their publications.
Then ask yourself these questions: Did the reviewers' expertise fit your topic? Were they knowledgeable about your methods? Did they understand the rationale for your research?
If the verdict is no for any of the above, the study section may not have been the best fit. Talk to colleagues and mentors to get their take and before you decide whether to request a new study section, keeping the following points in mind: You have no guarantee of anyone's presence at the meeting—including past reviewers—because participants rotate on and off, and NIH uses ad hoc reviewers.
You'll still have to address reviewer critiques from the first review even though that critique came from a different study section.
Your new study section sees the summary statement and expects you to make appropriate changes. Cautionary Notes About Resubmissions Consider the following words of caution: Use the most recent version of the FOA and forms, even if it's not the one you used originally.
Do not resubmit until you can send in the strongest possible application that effectively addresses all the reviewers' comments. We can't stress the point enough. If a significant amount of time passes before you can resubmit, reassess the science and consider submitting a new application instead of a resubmission, particularly if the science has evolved.
Don't launch into your resubmission until you've read our instructions and advice below. Rules for Resubmitting Resubmissions have several unique rules.
For example, you must address all your reviewers' points and highlight their comments in the introduction and usually in the Research Plan unless too much has changed.Get the latest health news, diet & fitness information, medical research, health care trends and health issues that affect you and your family on attheheels.com Dr.
Dale Birkle Dreer explains NIH's new policy on resubmission of grant applications in this blog post. NIH Has Changed the Resubmission Policy for Grant Applications Share: July 28, Dale Birkle Dreer, Ph.D.
you may request it in the cover letter for your application.
Maybe the reviewers thought the project was premature or. Feb 17, · Helping connect you with the NIH perspective, and helping connect us with yours Resubmissions Revisited: Funded Resubmission Applications and Their Initial Peer Review Scores Posted on February 17, by Mike Lauer.
NIH Suggested Cover Letter Format. The NIH Division of Receipt and Referral (DRR), Center for Scientific Review (CSR) strongly suggests that Principal Investigators use a specific format for cover letters requesting assignment to an Institute or Center (IC) and/or a Scientific Review Group (SRG).
Application Resubmissions SOP.
Frequently Asked Questions: Resubmissions of NIH Applications. NIH Resubmission Applications. December 4, Write a Cover Letter; Create a Resource Sharing Plan; Use the PHS Assignment Request Form; Research with Special Considerations.
Human Subjects. Molecules, an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal.