Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik C looks on before being escorted for a minute recess shortly after the start of the second day of his terrorism and murder trial in Oslo April 17, Breivik, 33, has admitted setting off a car bomb that killed eight people at government headquarters in Oslo last July, then killing 69 in a shooting spree at a summer youth camp organised by the ruling Labour Party. The trial is scheduled to last 10 weeks, during which the court must rule on both his guilt, and his sanity. Taking the stand at his trial for the first time, the high school drop-out read from a statement for an hour, ignoring pleas from the judge to stop and sparking criticism from victims he was being allowed to use the trial for violent propaganda.
I have also had some contact with Ronny Alte who is its current media spokesperson and by some media at least seen as the leader. Alte is currently on my Facebook friends list. The rewrite was submitted with the following edit summary: Firstly, I find it very unwise that such a major rewrite should be attempted in the midst of an ongoing AfD discussion.
Secondly, I really disapprove of such one-edit complete overhauls of already decent, full-length, articles as they can make assessment of the actual changes being made difficult to make.
This concern is of course amplified when the edit summary makes no references to the substantive changes of the edit. Having now made an initial analysis of the changes introduced in the edit by Filippusson, my concern is amplified manifold. What this now appears to be in my view, is an attempt to radically slant the article by burying and removing information that could be seen as damaging to the NDL itself.
A description of the changes with relevance to my suspicion of biased editing are as follows: That aside, I do acknowledge there is considerable new material that should be earnestly considered for inclusion.
To sum up, I seriously question why this editv which in such an underhanded way makes a radical change to several controversial topics, was made. Why were none of these issues declared?
Most importantly, my edit cleaned up the rather poor language and format of the current article. I suggest that the version be reverted back to my version which is superior in language and format, and that in turn content that I mistakenly removed from the old version should be put back into the article.
Given what the sources VG says about the third point, your interpretation is also misleading. I made posts at the two noticeboards not so much to elicit intervention or conflict resolution, more as a heads-up for interested and competent editors to be able to oversee the process here on the talk page of the article.
You should find it easy to agree that the way that "single edit" was made, other editors would be at a disadvantage attempting to assess the changes. Although I make an effort to apply good faiththe convergence of unfortunate factors in this matter still leaves me with a residual suspicion that all may not be as forthright and innocent as you now profess.
For that reason also, I am opposed to your suggestion that we revert to your version of the article which you claim is superior. If you agree to be working within the consensus-building model on which Wikipedia fundamentally operates, consenting to this should be easy.
I also note that you have neglected so far to address the request I raised on your talk page that relates to conflict of interest. I make the call again that you address this concern.
Now please stop making completely groundless accusations just because you disagree with an edit. I believe I had good reason to ask you to clarify your position.
But that is not an accusation, and you should know better than to throw that in my face. I want to start discussing this edit. The fact that he is the first person to have called for its founding should suffice, in my opinion. I find the first header to better indicate the content of this section.
Putting it at the start of a historic narrative in an encyclopedia is just to anachronistic in my opinion.
|The Boy Scouts motto is the right one. Make sure you are physically and mentally prepared before you set out and pack the appropriate gear for what you plan to do.|
|Anders Behring Breivik | Revolvy||Article Analysis Essay Sample While disbursement hours oppugning the ego — confessed slayer Anders Behring Breivik constabularies found out that he had a much more ambitious program with other marks which would include authorities edifices. There is a 1.|
|Norwegian Killer Anders Behring Breivik: Article Analysis | Essay Example||He adds that Breivik is:|
|Names[ edit ] His family name is Breivik, while Behring, his mother's maiden name, is his middle name and not part of the family name. His family name comes from Breivika in Hadseland literally means "broad vik "  or "broad bay.|
I think this should be mentioned briefly there, in addition to a more context-rich discussion in the later section. We can discuss it further or await more opinions if you like. The text sections are currently organized in the following pattern: Any suggestions for an improvement here? The membership section which you created was primarily splitting the previously integral history section into two parts.
There is one sentence at its beginning discussing the member count. If we should have a separate membership section, it should not contain the discussions about killings incident.
That belongs in the history section, where it previously resided. Separating these different aspects would require some rewrite, and possibly also some duplication or reference to information mentioned elsewhere.
I find that important.
Should it be mentioned in the lead section?Norwegian Killer Anders Behring Breivik: Article Analysis Essay Sample While disbursement hours oppugning the ego – confessed slayer Anders Behring Breivik constabularies found out that he had a much more ambitious program with other marks which would include authorities edifices.
the Labour Party central office. and the royal . Essay on Norwegian Killer Anders Behring Breivik: Article Analysis confessed killer Anders Behring Breivik police found out that he had a much more ambitious plan with other targets which would include government buildings, the Labour Party headquarters, and the royal palace in the center of the city.
There is a 1, page manifest.
Anders (Behring) Breivik (Norwegian pronunciation: [ˈɑnːəʂ ˈbeːrɪŋ ˈbræɪviːk] ; since legally Fjotolf Hansen, also known by his pseudonym Andrew Berwick), born 13 February , is a Norwegian far-right terrorist who committed the Norway attacks.
Before he massacred seventy-seven people, Anders Behring Breivik said that he was going to make his father proud. Photograph by Daniel Sannum Lauten / AFP Photo / Getty Norway is a small country. Psychiatrists assessing self-confessed Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik have concluded that he is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia.
They believe he was in a psychotic state both. Norwegian Killer Anders Behring Breivik: Article Analysis Essay Sample. While spending hours questioning the self – confessed killer Anders Behring Breivik police found out that he had a much more ambitious plan with other targets which would include government buildings, the Labour Party headquarters, and the royal palace in the center of the city.