History of liberalism Liberal democracy traces its origins—and its name—to the European 18th-century, also known as the Age of Enlightenment. At the time, the vast majority of European states were monarchieswith political power held either by the monarch or the aristocracy. The possibility of democracy had not been a seriously considered political theory since classical antiquity and the widely held belief was that democracies would be inherently unstable and chaotic in their policies due to the changing whims of the people. It was further believed that democracy was contrary to human natureas human beings were seen to be inherently evil, violent and in need of a strong leader to restrain their destructive impulses.
Some of these rights include the right to equality, liberty, free speech and other fundamental rights. And thus It Is impossible to have this form of democracy when these rights are being violated.
Western style democracy also entails that power be separated into different branches, and also free and fair elections be held Viral, Certain developing countries claim to be practicing western democracy, but they do so at the surface level.
By this, I mean they do not go beyond elections to consider what a true democracy should look like. Consequently, as mentioned In lecture, certain aspects of democracy such as the link between democracy, and equality are oft out, tampering with some fundamental rights.
If these countries claim to be democratic, but yet do not conform to certain aspects of what a democratic society should look like, then we cannot refer to them as a real democratic society. Another question that will be explored Is whether or not the abuse of human rights can be prevented In these countries.
This paper will argue that human right violations occur because decision Akers often weigh the costs and benefits of violating human rights before violating them intentionally Goodhearted, It will also argue that human rights violations could occur due to other issues, including political, and religious issues.
In order to develop my argument In this paper, I will be comparing the democratic system of countries that practice western democracy to the Democratic systems In other parts of the world [Africa, Latin America, and Asia].
I will do this in order to relay the social differences between the democracies that make Western-style Democracy unable to lorries in these countries. For clarification purposes, it is important to note that human right abuses could occur due to various reasons.
The government may be incapable of providing their citizens with the kind of help they need, and this may human rights are violated are corrupt, as we tend to believe. Also, human right adulations can take on different forms such as torture, extra-judicial killings, political Imprisonment, and disappearances Goodhearted, Extra-judicial killings are human rights violations that occur in countries like Burma for example, where prisoners are usually taken to an unknown location, then mysteriously disappear Amnesty, O begin, most African and Latin American countries are dominated by corruption, Inch makes it hard for western democracy to flourish.
Western democracy has a system of checks and balances on the power of the government, which restricts the government from abusing power and in turn represses corruption, which is a political right abuse Gloom, Countries like the United States, France, and Italy have a separation of power in the sense that the government is divided into the legislative, executive and Judicial systems Gloom, The Judicial systems and law enforcement bodies such as the FBI are independent from the government, Inch makes it impossible for the government to influence their decisions He-man, Also the FBI and other law enforcement bodies are committed to ensuring limited existence of corruption in the country, thus making corruption and consequently human right abuses unlikely.
Similarly, countries like Nigeria and India have checks and balances on the power of the government.
Nigeria for example has system that separates power between the three levels of government Gloom, However, where Nigeria differs from the western countries is in the lack of commitment by the law enforcement bodies to ensure that corruption is at its minimum.
This aspect of corruption has led to the undermining of human rights in Nigeria. In order for a democracy to exist, the will of the majority has to be represented through the elected individuals. However, the majority does not rule because the election votes are usually rigged.
Elections are often rigged because the political party owes the presidential seat to a particular individual, and has to make sure he gets his fair share of the presidency when the mime is due.
Election rigging leads to siphoning of public funds because they have to make up electoral results, and also pay the thugs that fill up the ballot boxes with fake votes Newsweek, Western style democracy cannot flourish when human rights Essay Under: Essays For the purpose of this paper, “Western-style democracy’ will refer to a form of preventative democracy, in which the law requires those in power to protect individual rights.
Re: Why Western-Style Democracy Sux Unread post by Romero» Fri Feb 20, pm Shen Li wrote: Universal suffrage is a noble idea on the surface, I won't deny that. Western style democracy cannot flourish when human rights Under: Paper For the purpose of this paper, “Western-style democracy’ will refer to a form of preventative democracy, in which the law requires those in power to protect individual rights.
Aug 31, · Saying that Western-style democracy has allowed corruption to flourish, the protest group wants a new government with a parliament in which most of the lawmakers are appointed and only 30 percent elected.".
Why did India copy directly Western-style democracy while China invents its own political "democratic" system?
Update Cancel. ad by Honey. simple launching welcomed policy cannot make the country moving forward. Why has India's Western style democracy demonstrated to the world that the India's Western style democracy .
Aug 20, · (CNN)-- Western-style multi-party democracy is possible but not suitable for Africa. There are two forms of democracy.
Democratic decisions can be taken by majority vote, which is the Western form. It has the advantage of being transparent, fast and efficient. But the downside is that it ignores minority positions.